NEC4 ECC Practitioner Course · Module 1 · Lesson 4 of 4
Acceptance and instructions
Why it matters
Dana accepts the wet well design, so who answers if it is wrong?
Dana Whitfield is the Project Manager. She sends Merrow Vale, the Contractor, acceptances and instructions every week.
Source: ECC 14.1, 21.2. Aldermere storyline.
The rule
Acceptance opens a gate but moves no risk
Acceptance means go ahead, not a transfer of risk.
It does
No Subcontractor is appointed before Dana accepts it (26.2).
Design work waits for Dana to accept the design (21.2).
It never changes
Acceptance leaves “the Contractor’s responsibility to Provide the Works or liability for its design” (14.1) unchanged.
Source: ECC 14.1, 21.2, 26.2.
The rule
Dana or Tom may delegate an action after notifying Merrow Vale
Tom Barrow is the Supervisor. A delegate needs a notification naming them.
- Notify firstIt names the delegate and the actions delegated.Clause 14.2
- The delegate actsIt counts as Dana's or Tom's own action.
- Cancel or act anywayEither may cancel it or still act.
Source: ECC 14.2.
The rule
Obey only a valid instruction
“The Contractor obeys an instruction which is in accordance with the contract” (27.3).
- 1
From Dana, Tom or a notified delegate?
Clauses 14.2, 27.3If no:Not an instructionAsk DanaIf yes, go on to question 2. - 2
May they give it?
If no:Not one to obeyOnly Dana changes the Scope (14.3)If yes, go on to the outcome. - Obey it
Source: ECC 14.2, 14.3, 27.3.
See it on the project
Merrow Vale gets three green lights in 2026
Decide first.
- 23 JanDana accepts Cobalt Pumps as a Subcontractor.
- 31 MarDana accepts the wet well design.
- 5 JunTom sees the joint retest pass.
A flaw turns up in the accepted design. Who pays?
Can Tom still notify a Defect in the retested joints?
Source: ECC 14.1, 26.1, 43.2. Aldermere storyline.
Try it
Sort five requests Merrow Vale receives
Run each request through the two questions from the last screen.
…
Obey it
- Dana instructs a flatter embankment slope through the portal.
- Tom instructs a search for a Defect in the culvert joints.
Not an instruction to obey
- Suppose Tom instructs a change to the headwall design.
- Suppose an engineer for the Client, Aldermere Water, never named in a notification, asks for an extra access ramp.
- Suppose Aldermere Water's finance team tells Merrow Vale to work in a different order.
Source: ECC 14.2, 14.3, 27.3, 43.1, 60.1(1).
Quick check · Acceptance
Two questions on what you have just covered
Answer, then read why.
2 questions to answer
Source: ECC 14.4, 21.2.
Recap
Check the sender of each instruction, and keep the risk after each acceptance
Log each Scope change in the Compensation Event Register.
On Monday at work
- Keep a list of notified delegates and what each may do.
- Check who sent an instruction before you act on it.
- Keep your own design checks after Dana accepts a design (14.1).
In the Toolkit: NEC4 Compensation Event Register (ECC and ECS) (Excel) Members
Independent course material. It is not published or endorsed by NEC. Clause references are to the NEC4 Engineering and Construction Contract, June 2017 with amendments January 2023. The project and the people are invented. Short quotes from NEC4 (© NEC 2017) and the FIDIC Red Book (© FIDIC 2017) are used for review and comment. Read the full clauses in your own copy of the contract.
Source: ECC 14.1, 14.2, 14.3, 27.3.
Go deeper (optional)
Two edge cases with instructions and acceptance
Optional. Two cases that come up on long jobs.
Is every instruction that changes the Scope a compensation event?
ECC 60.1(1)
Dana does not reply to a design in time. Is the design accepted?
ECC 21.2, 60.1(6)
Source: ECC 21.2, 60.1(1), 60.1(6).